Link to PDF file
No. 35034 - State ex rel. Corporation of Charles Town v. Sanders, et al.
Benjamin, Chief Justice, concurring:
On the tort claim pending against petitioner Charles Town, I agree with the
Court's opinion that a writ should issue with respect to the direct immunity question. What
I find more curious, and perhaps worthy of further legal development at some point, is the
contractual obligations which Charles Town owes to respondent, Jackson-Perks Post No. 71,
Inc. (Post). To the extent the majority believes a municipality may not obligate itself to
keep property it chooses to lease in a certain manner, I disagree. Should the Post ultimately
be held responsible in tort for injuries herein, I believe the question of a contractual claim by
the Post against Charles Town to possibly still be viable. Otherwise, municipalities would
be free to negotiate terms of contracts with private citizens which the municipality has no
intention of keeping. A citizen who detrimentally relies on such representations could then
forego obtaining liability insurance only to be held liable in place of the municipality who
is the actual tortfeasor. I do not believe the Legislature intended such a result.