McGraw, J., concurring, in part, and dissenting, in part:
I concur with the majority's decision that the Policemen's Civil Service
Commission has the authority to investigate whether or not a vacancy exists within the police
department. I agree with the majority that Police Commissions have extensive investigatory
powers, and that Police Commissions serve as a counterbalance to the mayor's broad
However, I dissent to the majority's conclusion that the city has unbridled discretion to determine whether or not a vacancy exists. As the majority noted in syllabus point 3, An underlying purpose of the police civil service statute . . . is to give security to members of paid police departments of municipalities having a population of five thousand or more against the vicissitudes of municipal elections. (citing syl. pt. 4, in part, Dougherty v. City of Parkersburg , 138 W. Va. 1, 76 S.E.2d 594 (1952)). Granting the city sole authority to determine vacancies creates a temptation for the city to eliminate positions when officials simply don't like the personality or politics of a particular candidate. Because I think that Police Civil Service Commissions should play a larger role in this process, I must respectfully dissent to this aspect of the majority opinion.